CHAMPAGNE PROFESSIONAL ORGANISATIONS


Origins, history and objectives
of the Union of Great Brands and Champagne Houses

       As early as 1886, the social status of the employees was one of the preoccupations of the Houses. This was when they participated financially in the creation of a "Société de Secours Mutuel des Ouvriers des Caves de Reims" (the Society of Mutual Assistance for the cellar workers of Reims (It still exists today under the name of Corporation des Tonneliers & Cavistes : Corporation of barrel makers and cellar workers).

       In 1919, two joint commissions for discussion saw the light of day, one at Reims and the other at Épernay, because each town had different employees and social benefits. That of Épernay was presided over by Robert-Jean de Vogüé, President of the House of Moët & Chandon. This House obtained a gold medal in 1900 at the Universal Exhibition for all of its social activities: free medical service, financial help in case of sickness, family assistance, housing, social loans, gardens, legal aid, pensions...

       At Épernay, the Auban Moët hospital, at Reims the Hôtel historique de la Mutualité (the historic public building for mutual insurance) and the important retirement home offered by Roederer, or even the Taittinger holiday centre on the Isle de Ré, remind us today of the long tradition of social patronage by the Champagne Houses.

      The social unrest of 1936, which shook most of the French industrial sectors was however spared from the wines of Champagne thanks to the constructive discussion between the employers and the employee representatives. They agreed on the first "collective contract", defining the social status of the employees working in the Champagne Houses. These were the beginnings of a "Collective Agreement", whose use did not develop in other sectors of activity until the 1950's and which is still today the basis of social discussion in France.

      The sad period of 1940-1945 had the effect of strengthening the connections established between the employers and the employee representatives. They displayed a very courageous example when they faced the Nazi occupiers in defending the President of the House of Moët and Chandon, Robert-Jean de Vogüé, arrested and deported in 1943. Amongst the historic leaders of the Champagne employees is Gaston Martin who, since 1936, was at the origin of the tireless and fruitful social discussions with the Champagne employers.

      After the war, the "Three-party Commission" regularly improved the social status of the Champagne employees reaching an exceptionally advantageous level, both in wages and social benefits. This was codified by the Collective Agreement and made obligatory for all companies elaborating Champagne by a decree of the Ministries for Agriculture and Social Affairs.

      As we enter the 21st century, the discussion between employers and employees is more widespread. Each House maintains direct relations with the employee representatives in its company. This aims to establish a personal relationship with each employee, allowing him both to be happy in his work and to obtain social promotion via professional training. Nevertheless, the discussions between employers and employee trade unions continue collectively at the heart of the Three-party Commission. This continues to fulfil its permanent role of updating the minimum obligatory social status in all companies whose principal business activity is to elaborate and/or market Champagne.

      It meets at least once a year to negotiate the level of salary scales and social benefits awarded as an obligatory minimum to all of the employees without prejudicing any additional advantages eventually agreed by internal discussions within the Houses.

      The employees who work in a company whose main activity remains agricultural ("propriétaires récoltants" - growers owning vineyards) are not part of this agreement because they benefit from the Collective Agreement of viticultural operations in delimited region of Champagne. This is managed by the "Commission mixte viticole" (Joint Viticultural Commission), whose employer representatives are designated by the General Trade Union of Champagne Vine-growers.

      The Champagne Three-party Commission regroups three representative delegations :
      - of all the employers whose company exercises, as its main activity, the champagnisation and/or the marketing of the wines of Champagne (APE 15.9 F and G) in the area of AOC Champagne,
      - of the 5 trade unions representing the employees of the general social security scheme (CGC, CGT, FO, CFDT, SMECC),
      - of the 4 trade unions representing the employees of the MSA agricultural scheme.

You can discover :
The detail of the agreements obtained
by the Champagne Three-party Commission,
which make up the Collective Agreement
( french only )
 
The overview of salaries and social benefits
of the Champagne House employees

      The successive Presidents of the Champagne Three-party Commission were :

1930-1940     Robert-Jean de Voguë (Moët & Chandon)
1942              René CHAYOUX (Ayala)
1956              Christian HEIDSIECK (Charles Heidsieck)
1966              François d'AULAN (Piper Heidsieck)
1973              Paul BERGEOT (Besserat de Bellefon)
1986              Michel KAIQUE (Piper Heidsieck)
1998              Alain THIENOT (Alain Thiénot)
1999              Claude FOURNIER

2005              Patrick MOLLIEN (Laurent-Perrier – Mumm & Perrier-Jouët)